# Better input data for finding DEGs

**URL:** <https://discourse.scverse.org/t/better-input-data-for-finding-degs/1285>\
**Category:** scanpy\
**Created:** [April 5, 2023, 8:24am UTC](https://discourse.scverse.org/t/better-input-data-for-finding-degs/1285 "2023-04-05T08:24:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jundaramg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e480ec/32.png) [@jundaramg](https://discourse.scverse.org/u/jundaramg)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2023, 8:24am UTC](https://discourse.scverse.org/t/better-input-data-for-finding-degs/1285/1 "2023-04-05T08:24:42Z")

</div>

Which is better input data for finding markers, log-normalized data or pearson-residual normalized data?  
Additionally I want to know if log-normalized data would be used for input data, should the genes in data be selected?
