# Cellranger\_aggr data

**URL:** <https://discourse.scverse.org/t/cellranger-aggr-data/2337>\
**Category:** scirpy\
**Created:** [June 18, 2024, 2:05am UTC](https://discourse.scverse.org/t/cellranger-aggr-data/2337 "2024-06-18T02:05:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![1w2y3x6078](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.scverse.org/1w2y3x6078/32/1083_2.png) [@1w2y3x6078](https://discourse.scverse.org/u/1w2y3x6078)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2024, 2:05am UTC](https://discourse.scverse.org/t/cellranger-aggr-data/2337/1 "2024-06-18T02:05:49Z")

</div>

Hello, I have a question for you

The filtered\_contig\_annotations.csv file for all samples in the 10X single-cell Cellranger\_aggr data has a filtered\_contig\_annotations.csv analysis Scirpy for each sample, with 10 samples. Is there a difference between them? Which data is better to use?

10X single-cell Cellranger\_aggr：cellranger-7.2.0/cellranger aggr

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grst](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.scverse.org/grst/32/17_2.png) [@grst](https://discourse.scverse.org/u/grst)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2024, 5:51am UTC](https://discourse.scverse.org/t/cellranger-aggr-data/2337/2 "2024-06-19T05:51:05Z")

</div>

As far as I can tell, there’s no benefit in running cellranger aggr. I would typically read the individual files and aggregate them in Python.